We’ve come to know Lisbeth Salander as a complex character. Her past brims with tragedy and her present life is perhaps even more harrowing. She’s smart, resourceful and refuses to give up even after being abused, shot, and framed for murder. It’s here where the third film seems to stray from this intrepid perseverance. Salander seems unwilling to help her own cause as she refuses to cooperate with law enforcement, judiciary officials, and even her own defense attorney. It’s true she’s been violated by those in power, but the unrelenting fighter we’re familiar with appears to purposely make choices detrimental to her own chances at freedom. Dismissing conversation with her abusers is one thing, but offering only silence to those attempting to help her feels counterproductive and perplexing.
Loose ends are tied up and all questions are answered (save for the reason Lisbeth has a large dragon tattoo on her back), yet the serial killers, murderers, and rapists take a back seat to conspiracies and courtrooms. There’s still mystery to some degree, but attempting to exonerate Salander and catching the remaining members of The Section proves less intriguing than the perilous sleuthing from the first two films. The trial sequences, while interesting in their vast differences to American judicial portrayals, also lacks the intensity of tracking down merciless killers. Salander does finally find justice and a little revenge, though it’s anticlimactic in presentation and devoid of much energy. The conclusion of the previous film hints at the reunion of the two protagonists and the possibility of their mutual involvement in absolving Salander, but Hornet’s Nest doesn’t deliver on that promise and we only briefly see the two interact. It’s a shame, and a little disappointing, as Blomkvist and Salander are the driving forces behind the entire series and easily two of the most fascinating characters in modern thrillers.
- Joel Massie