With so few characters involved, the acting is imperatively exceptional. Edward Albert expertly portrays the blind but confident Don, who strives for independence and acknowledgement of his abilities, not his disabilities. It’s a powerful and convincing performance, brimming with conviction and emotion. Eileen Heckart as the overprotective, domineering mother also delivers a mesmerizing turn that netted her the best supporting actress Oscar for 1973. On the opposite end of the spectrum is Goldie Hawn’s whimsical, ditzy coquette who embodies both carefree chatterbox and fickle flirt. It’s irksome at times, but offers the playfulness that complements the other more serious roles.
Butterflies are Free features a fast romance between an unlikely couple and the subsequent mishaps, tragedies and revelations created by intolerance and judgment. Jill is reminiscent of Breakfast at Tiffany’s Holly Golightly in her naivety and flightiness, but while the struggle to reform and adapt, which leads to a Hollywood ending, is welcome in Blake Edward’s film, here it doesn’t feel as sincere. Don’s battle is the one that demands a triumph and revelation that he earns on his own, not the easier alternative where happiness falls neatly at his feet. It’s a shame the conclusion doesn’t match the brilliance witnessed in the initial struggles of wills and verbiage that punctuate both the young couple’s short-lived, bittersweet romance and the subsequent rapid-fire obstinacy between overbearing mother and defiant son.
- Joel Massie
I just watched Butterflies are Free last night and it caused me to write my reaction to the review. The reason why Jill comes back is because Don's words affected and changed her deeply. It might not necessarily be a happily ever after ending. It just means that she took the first step in changing her ways by coming back. I love this story!